Review of Nanoparticles in Ultrapure Water

UF even withstands episodic increase of particle numbers in the feed (e.g., caused by conditioning of ion-exchange resins) without negative effects for water quality and service lifetime. Such a particle challenge typically involves high concentrations of ~10-nanometer (nm) particles. On the other hand, current on-line particle counters approach their lower detection limit at about 10nm. Large numbers of particles nearby and below this limit remain undetected. Hence, the integrity of a UF membrane is essential to keep these small particles under control; it can hardly be evaluated by comparing particle counts upstream and downstream. Therefore, better test methods are needed to identify membrane damages, and to decide on service life and replacement of UF membranes.

This presentation was given as part of the Ultrapure Micro 2021 annual conference. It was given as part of the airborne molecular contamination (AMC) and high purity gases control strand.

This presentation was given as part of the Ultrapure Micro 2021 annual conference. It was given as part of the ultrapure water strand.

This article provides an overview of the biggest challenge of UPW technology – particle control. The latest semiconductor technologies require near particle-free water, where the “killer” particle size is far below the size that UPW metrology can effectively detect. Also, current advanced treatment methods cannot guarantee reliable removal of killer-sized particles. The quality of the high-purity materials used downstream of the final filters has not typically been tested for shedding of the “killer” particles. Consequently, the semiconductor industry requires a comprehensive approach for the particle control. A new approach should include mitigating particle occurrence and continuously improving the technologies used in UPW polish and distribution systems. Such an approach should also include extensive use of SEMI standards to improve the quality of the materials used; a new way to engineer solutions related to system-configuration and system design; improved process control; and a careful review of critical operational decisions. Collaboration throughout the industry via IRDS and SEMI Standards is key to enabling such systematic improvement, and overcoming the metrology and other constraints. This article was originally published in the Ultrapure Micro Journal in November 2017.

Nanoparticle contamination of ultrapure water (UPW) for microelectronics fabrication is expected to significantly decrease the yield and reliability of semiconductor devices. Tight nanoparticles control poses a technical and analytical challenge, especially in the particle size range down to a few nanometres. Most state-of-the-art online particle counters do not address the needs of advanced microelectronics manufacturing with critical particle sizes below 20 nm. Therefore, understanding of sources of nanoparticle contamination and strategies for control is limited. This study aims to profile nanoparticles ≥10 nm in a full-scale UPW polishing system after each process step using two novel particle measurement systems: an optical particle counter and an acoustic particle counter. For the first time, the performance of a whole UPW polishing system, including a Reverse Osmosis (RO) unit in terms of particle rejection, was investigated. Both particle counter instruments were evaluated with positive results. A statistical analysis was carried out to compare the significance of the particle counts achieved by the two different detection principles. Profiling throughout the UPW polishing system revealed that both instruments measure particle concentrations in the same range. The data is consistent and shows a clear trend: ion exchange mixed bed, Reverse Osmosis (RO) and ultrafiltration remove particles and represent sinks for nanoparticles ≥20 nm. The removal of nanoparticles between 10 nm and 20 nm is limited in this case however, especially for the final ultrafiltration. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with elemental analysis demonstrated that the particle chemistry was diverse. This indicates that different particle chemistries and particle properties might have influenced the particle counts. The results contribute to the advanced understanding of nanoparticle behaviour in UPW and provides more confidence in terms of monitoring at the lower particle range. This article was originally published in the Ultrapure Micro Journal in March 2019.

This Q&A session took place at the 2020 Ultrapure Micro annual conference. It was a part of the Ultrapure Water Production track, and included speakers from the UPW Process Optimization session.

This presentation was given at the Ultrapure Micro 2020 annual conference. It was presented in the Ultrapure Water Production track, as part of the UPW Contamination Control session.

This presentation was given at the Ultrapure Micro 2020 annual conference. It was presented in the Ultrapure Water Production track, as part of the UPW Process Optimization session.

This presentation was given at the Ultrapure Micro 2020 annual conference. It was presented in the Ultrapure Water Production track, as part of the UPW Process Optimization session.

This presentation was given at the Ultrapure Micro 2019 annual conference. It was presented during the Learning Series, as part of the Ultrapure Water Production track.